2005 Digital Imaging Workshop |
What is your evaluation of the following, where 1 is poor and 5 is great? |
A: The level of the workshop was: |
B: The location and building was: |
C: The price of the workshop was: |
D: Would you like another workshop? |
E: The lunch arrangement was: |
F: Buying a Digital Camera by Chris Taylor |
G: Image Processing by Bert Schopf |
H: Output Options by Harald Freise |
I: Problems and Solutions by Jocelyn Doire |
Nbr | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | What was done well? | What should be improved? | What subjects we should cover? | Other Comments |
Avg: | 4.6 | 4.5 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.6 | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.1 | ||||
1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | Output Options & Image Processing | |||
2 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | ||||
3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | All | Excellent | ||
4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | Organization, pace, timing, Q&As | Room too warm | |||
5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Sound | ||||
6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | Presentation were well organised and clear | Great door prizes, like the idea of handout CD, etc | ||
7 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | Well presented, informative and on schedule | Great day | ||
8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | ||||
9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | Most subjects (presentation) | Everything very well presented | ||
10 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | Door prizes, voices carry well, CD | ||||
11 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | On time, as advertised, CD | Circulate air | Good format and quality, really pleased | ||
12 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | All aspects of presentations | |||
13 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | Parking | Give more advice on parking | ||
14 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | (?) | Room | ||
15 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | Lunch set up and workshops | Room too warm | Scrapbooking | Post direction at entrance to 3rd floor |
16 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | Room too warm | |||
17 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | All | Lunch arrangement | OS upgrade | Excellent presentations. Thank you. |
18 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | ||||
19 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | ||||
20 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | ||||
21 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | Well thought throug | Parking | |||
22 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | ||||||||
23 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | Good level, not too complicated | Video editing | Speakers explained things clearly | |
24 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | |||||
25 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | Creating a web page | Adding music to slide shows. As always, I got a lot of info | ||
26 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | Dialogues with audience were valuable | |||||
27 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | Concise & clear, tips sharing | Good Depth & extent of knowledge | ||
28 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | Organisation, sequence, documentation | Lunch could be shorter to finish earlier a long day | ||
29 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | Presentation, breaks, lunch, prizes | CD of workshop is very useful | ||
30 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | Reading specs | Internet & security. Last presentation had some overlap | ||
31 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | ||||
32 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | Visually very good | MS XP Protocol | Very educational day – Enjoyed it very much | ||
33 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | Group size, kept moving along well | |||
34 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | Excellent speakers | Better chairs | Phtoshop Elements | Best courses combo I've had in Ottawa | |
35 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | Timing, CD | (?) | Camera accessories | More image editing. Well prepared and caring presenters. | |
36 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |||||
37 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | CD | Repeat questions | Image processing was too short | |
38 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | ||||
39 | Good all around except food could be better | ||||||||||||
40 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | Entire day very well-run | Too bad that second presentation used an expensive program |